- 1edisource /
- Blog /
- Choosing the Right EDI Fit
Choosing the Right EDI Fit: EDI HeadQuarters, ManagedXchange, or AtlasExchange?
We break down how each model works to help you align your choice with your team’s responsibilities and technical capacity.
At 1 EDI Source, an Epicor company, we’ve supported thousands of businesses as they digitize document exchange with trading partners. One pattern stands out: EDI requirements look different for every organization.
That’s why we offer three EDI models designed around operational needs:
- EDI HeadQuarters — In-house control with full ownership of tools and mapping
- ManagedXchange — Fully managed by our team, including infrastructure and partner onboarding
- AtlasExchange — A hybrid model that offers user control over EDI tasks while Epicor manages infrastructure and trading partner maps.
We’ve broken down the benefits and challenges of each option, highlighting how AtlasExchange supports businesses that want more oversight without managing technical responsibilities directly.
EDI HeadQuarters: When You Want Full Ownership
EDI HeadQuarters is designed for businesses with internal EDI resources. You manage trading partner relationships, map logic, and infrastructure using 1 EDI Source tools.
Common reasons teams choose EDI HeadQuarters:
- Direct integration with internal systems
- Control over processing schedules and updates
- Access to mapping and monitoring interfaces
Challenges to consider:
- Requires in-house EDI knowledge
- Responsibility for compliance and uptime
- Onboarding new partners may take time without prebuilt resources
ManagedXchange: When You Want Full Support
With ManagedXchange, 1 EDI Source manages your EDI environment end-to-end—from hosting and mapping to monitoring. Your team stays focused on core operations while we handle daily EDI needs.
Common reasons teams choose ManagedXchange:
- No need for internal EDI staff when you have a dedicated ManagedXchange support team
- Support available from experienced EDI professionals
Challenges to consider:
- Change requests handled exclusively through 1 EDI Source
- Less direct access to troubleshoot document-level issues
- Limited ability to adjust logic in real-time
AtlasExchange: When You Want Shared Control
AtlasExchange supports teams that want real-time visibility and document control, without taking on infrastructure or partner management.
What we manage: trading partner maps, system hosting, and routing
What you manage: document tracking, issue resolution, and day-to-day flow via our AtlasExchange portal
Why teams choose AtlasExchange:
- Direct access to view, resend, and manage documents
- Hosted infrastructure managed by 1 EDI Source
- Useful for teams looking for a hybrid approach to EDI management
Conclusion: An EDI Portfolio to Match Your Operational Model
EDI is not one-size-fits-all. That’s why 1 EDI Source supports multiple models that let your team set the right level of control.
- Choose EDI HeadQuarters for full control and internal ownership
- Choose ManagedXchange for EDI that is fully managed by our team
- Choose AtlasExchange for visibility without the infrastructure lift
Still weighing the options? Talk to an EDI expert to discuss what fits your technical team and business goals. Contact Us
Lisa Bounds is a Principal Product Marketing Manager with the Epicor EDI team. She is an experienced marketing leader with a passion for blending strategy and creativity to drive impactful go-to-market initiatives.
